I hope I speak for more than just myself. I don't understand why the Supreme Court's CLE commission won't permit all of our CLE hours to be taken online, whether by prerecorded lesson or by live webcast. I sent a question to them awhile back, and the response I got was that they'd considered it a couple of years ago, and had increased the number of hours, and there really wasn't a need to revisit it. The world is changing. In fact, it's already changed. More and more education is being accomplished online. The legal profession should be willing to adapt. Not only that, but for those of us who live in remote locations (Athens for me), driving to CLE in Columbus involves not just time lost on the road, but for those who are concerned about our "carbon footprint," it involves the use of gasoline and emissions into the atmosphere. If the concern is that lawyers will not pay attention and will cheat if they are able to take all their CLE online, then I have a couple of responses. The first is that even at in-person CLE I've seen a few colleagues working on files and reading newspapers rather than paying attention to what's being taught. The other is that the assumption that most or even many lawyers will cheat feeds into the public perception of our profession that I thought the Supreme Court was trying to combat - that we're cheats and swindlers. If we're telling the public that lawyers are honest and professional, then can't we give ourselves the benefit of the doubt that we are indeed honest and professional, and invest trust in the members of the profession that we'll pay attention if we're taking CLE online? I know the OSBA has many more important matters to tackle than this, but I hope soon you might try to persuade the Supreme Court's CLE Commission to trust us and allow us to join the rest of the world that's taking full advantage of online educational capabilities. Allow us to take all CLE online, please.