Schools Have Authority To Search Lockers

​​As increasing numbers of students have been bringing weapons to school in recent years, preventing violence has become critical. Searching student lockers can prove to be a useful tool, not only in preventing shocking attacks, but also in keeping schools alcohol- and drug-free. 
Q: Are schools authorized to search student lockers? 
A: Yes. Ohio law gives school boards the authority to institute a policy allowing school officials to search lockers without student permission. Courts will balance a student's privacy rights against the school's interest in discipline and safety. Students have less protection against unreasonable searches and seizures while at school than in other places. 

Q: What type of locker search policy might my child's school have?
A: One type of permissible search policy the school board may adopt would allow a “random” search of any pupil’s locker and its contents at any time. This type of policy requires the school board to post, in a conspicuous place in each school building, a notice that the lockers are the property of the board and that they and their contents are subject to random search at any time. This type of policy does not require the school to suspect, prior to a search, that illegal or inappropriate items are in the lockers.

Another type of policy, which the board may use in addition to or in place of a “random" search policy, would allow a school official to search any student’s locker and the contents of the locker, but only if the official “reasonably suspects” that the locker or its contents contain evidence of a student’s violation of a criminal statute or school rule. 

Even if a board does not adopt one of the above policies, an official still may search lockers and their contents if an emergency situation exists that immediately threatens the health and safety of any person or threatens to damage or destroy any property that the board controls. Therefore, if the official believes that searching lockers will help to dispel a threat, he or she may do so.

Q: What sort of “reasonable suspicion” would justify a locker search?
A: In a recent case, a teacher observed a student smoking a cigarette in school in clear violation of school rules. While talking with the student, the teacher thought she smelled marijuana, which the student denied. When later called to the principal’s office, the student was asked to turn his pockets inside out, but there was no evidence of wrongdoing. The principal then searched the student's locker. In a pocket of the student’s book bag, in the locker, the principal found a pipe containing residue believed to be marijuana. The student was suspended from school and also found to be a delinquent child by the local juvenile court. Despite the student's claim that the search was illegal, the court found that the search was "reasonable" based on evidence provided by the teacher who had observedthe student smoking and had smelled suspected marijuana.

Q: When is a search not justified?
A:  Because of the broad nature of permissible serach policies that schools, it is very rare that a school's search of a student’s locker is not justified. However, it may be inappropriate for a school to conduct a more extensive search of a student’s personal property that is not located in a locker. A court decision arising from an after-school fight between two students illustrates what constitutes a violation of student rights. In the case, one student pulled a knife on a second student. Although the fight ended without violence, the victimized student was told that either the perpetrator or a third girl would bring a knife to school the next day to resume the fight. 

The principal searched the third girl's purse, but did not see any weapon. The principal continued searching until she noticed a small zippered pocket inside the purse. Although there were no signs of a weapon in the zippered pocket, she placed her hand inside it. She felt only a plastic bag, which she did not think contained a weapon. Nevertheless, she took the plastic bag out of the zippered pocket and discovered that it contained cocaine.

The court found that the principal’s search was illegal, since the drugs were not immediately visible and the principal did not have a “reasonable suspicion” that the search of the purse would uncover drugs. The principal only had reasonable suspicion, based on earlier threats, to search the purse for a weapon, and there was no suspicion that the plastic bag contained a knife. The court deemed the search to be motivated by simple curiosity about what was inside the bag, rather than a reasonable suspicion that it contained drugs.


This “Law You Can Use” column was provided by the Ohio State Bar Association (OSBA). It was originally prepared by Columbus attorney Richard A. Slee, and  updated by attorney Kerry Agins, of the special education firm, Agins & Gilman LLC.

Articles appearing in this column are intended to provide broad, general information about the law. This article is not intended to be legal advice. Before applying this information to a specific legal problem, readers are urged to seek advice from a licensed attorney.



Staff Directory

Contact Information


8 A.M. - 5 P.M.
Monday - Friday